"Some of indicators used for assessing performance are extrapolated and based on surmises and unscientific methods," the Ministry of Environment said

India has rejected the Environmental Performance Index 2022 released recently, stating it has many indicators based on unfounded assumptions.

Rebutting analysis and conclusions of the Environmental Performance Index 2022, point by point, the Ministry of Environment said: “A new indicator in the Climate Policy objective is Projected GHG Emissions levels in 2050. This is computed based on the average rate of change in emission of the last 10 years instead of modelling that takes into account a longer time period, extent of renewable energy capacity and use, additional carbon sinks, energy efficiency of respective countries.”

The Ministry further said that both forests and wetlands of the country are crucial carbon sinks which have not been factored in while computing the projected GHG emissions trajectory up to 2050 given by EPI 2022.

“Historical data on the lowest emission trajectory has been ignored in the above computation. The weight of indicators in which the country was performing well has been reduced and reasons for change in assignment of weights has not been explained in the report,” the Ministry noted.

“The principle of equity is given very low weightage in the form of indicators like GHG emission per capita and GHG Emission intensity trend. The CBDR-RC principle is also barely reflected in the composition of the index,” the Ministry of Environment maintained.

“India has already achieved the target of 40% of installed electricity capacity from non- fossil fuel-based sources. The Copernicus air pollutant concentration data based on which DALYs are derived have higher uncertainty in regions with less extensive monitoring networks and emissions inventories. This limitation reduces the chance of accurate assessment of Air Quality,” the Ministry underlined.

“The indicators on Water quality, Water use efficiency, Waste Generation per capita which are closely linked to Sustainable Consumption and Production are not included in the Index,” the Ministry stated, adding “the Index emphasizes the extent of Protected Areas rather than the quality of protection that they afford. Management Effectiveness Evaluation of Protected areas and eco-sensitive regions is not factored into the computation of Biodiversity Indices.”

“Again, the index computes the extent of ecosystems but not their condition or productivity. Efforts must be made to include metrics that truly capture ecosystem productivity such that regulatory, provisioning as well as cultural services provided by various ecosystems like forests, wetlands, croplands are assessed and reflected in performance,” the Ministry added.

“Indicators like Agro biodiversity, soil health, food loss and waste are not included even though they are important for developing countries with large agrarian populations,” the Ministry noted.